Math And Science Tit Bits

On 12-D Reality - 2 x 3D x 3D x 3D x 3D

2012-02-04T21:54:00.000-08:00

On Being Asked: How Does Energy Travel in Vacuum of Space?

Basically their is no vacuum in the Space. It is full of Something which Maxwell called it Ether, and is the Dark Energy of Science. There is basically a Geometrical Space for instantiating Reality, like the Canvas, which we see as something filled up or not filled up. That divides the Visible and the Dark Energy/Matter. Then there is the Ethereal Space, or the Indian Yogis Pranic Field, or the Chinese Chi Field, which is the basis for all Geometric Space we see. One can modify this to change Space around. I do this as part of my BioTelekinesis Experiment. Gravity is supposed to modify this Ethereal Space, which is saying that the slope of the Space vs Time in Response Curve is changed, e.g., like the Audio Frequency Response graph. But actually Gravity is still a higher level Force. It is this ES which gives rise to Gravity. There EMF waves travel like E Wave becoming M Wave, after Time Differentiation, but they are like a spiral in 3D Space but with 2 different 2D perspectives. What is not taught that the 3D Ethereal Space offers itself as medium for E and M waves to traverse, but they are part and parcel of the same Reality. So this is how the Energy Travels.

But why does it travel? Actually the Reality in my understanding is a 12-D Reality where each 3D is offered by M, E, ES (Ethereal Space), and RS (Radial Space), and these spheres are acting like a 2 x 3-D x 3-D x 3-D X 3D Gyroscope at Planck unit levels. You disturb one, and the others instantaneously, faster than speed of light, compensates.

A Photon shot form nothing in Space is an example of this disturbance. So speed of light can be broken in boundary conditions. If you imagine a point is 3D Geometric Sphere super imposed by these 3D x 3D x 3D x 3D, E-M-ES-RS Spheres, if a point moves in 3D, the other 3D move to compensate like a Gyroscope. And the radial component moves to adjust the final noise - which what we see as Visible Universe!

Think this to be equivalent of 1D Fourier Series and 3D Harmonic Series. You need a factor of 2 because of a double cover issue.

Do an experiment, where you take an unit ball, and run from N pole to Front Pole on Equator, 1/4 of circumference, and do right and left turns alternatively, to get away from the bias of Spin. You would see you have arrived back at N Pole, but only covered 1/2 of the Surface of Sphere, assuming the sweep of area by two sides, but no sides being repeated in consideration. So you need 2 of Spheres for just N pole. But for East and Front Poles, we need the same. Each pole is covered by one 3D Energy, which is E, M, ES, and RS - for radial adjustments.

Using this I can explain everything about known Physics and not conflict with any Science. I only reinterpret Michelson Mosley Experiment. You can not measure the Subtle by Gross and that was their fallacy.

Does Heat Expand Matter ? Not Really !!

2012-01-14T16:07:00.000-08:00

We are taught that Heat is the cause of the Expansion of Matter.

We would take this matter and come to a reverse conclusion that the expansion of Space is the cause of rise in Heat and Temprature.

The concept is subtler but can be made easier if one tries to think of this analogy. What is subtler: Sound or Light? We know the answer: It is Light!

We know Sound is created by movement of pressure-differntial-waves of moving denser-lighter matter molecules, whether it is air, gas, liquid or solid, and these mechanical vibrations are sensed by our Hearing Instrument System.

These vibrations are felt by the ear drum, carried through Ear Drum Vibrations, Hammer, Anvil and Stirrup Bones, and the Horseshoe like Stirrup vibrating on the Oval window of Innear Ear's Chochlea, which disturb the Cilliary -- hair like floating neural fibres -- in the liquid surroundings of Chochlea. These vibrations then are carried further as triggers to neural pathways onto Brain's Auditory Cortex, next to ear.

We know Light is a Photon Particle or Wave which our Eye's Lens Focus on Eye's Retina, which in turn trigger Rods and Cones Cells of Retina to create some Neural-Electrical activity that is further carried to Visual Cortex, in the rear of the head.

We know electrons interact with lights, and photons have "no mass" but electron has mass. Similary, the molecules, -- which have many electrons, and heavier protons and neutrons -- carry the changing pressure-waves from their vibrations are nothing but grosser than photon vibrations carried through light.

So what is Heat? What is Temprature? Heat is function of Temprature and Specific Heat of Matter, and the dimension of the medium where it is stored or transmitted.

We only know them because we experience them through our Motor and Sensory Cortex, which is grosser Mechanical System, even compared to the Auditory Cortex!

If Hearing is tuned to subtler and higher frquency mechanical vibrations, than the Mechanical-Sensory Cortex is tuned to Slower frequency of mechanical vibrations of matter!

Common to all this is the Space that is the medium and it is affected by Light, Sound and Heat!

So a light can increase the electron activity and make it take higher orbits - which is nothing but an expansion of Space.

What is not known to current Science but is called as Dark Energy. This is the Prana of Indians and Chi of Chinese. This is akin to Space and is a form of Energy, which is as subtle as EMF and Light!

In fact one can think of Space as a form of Energy! Confused? Think of Space we think of as a Logical and Geometrical Manifestation in our minds, and the Space as Energy is the Physical Manifestation over the Logical Space which we experience!

This Space -- and Pranic -- energy can modify the Logical Space. Is this not Einstein said? Mass and Energy modifies Space-Time Fabric? (It is actually the change in Space would change the relationship between Space and Time -- with different degrees of Space expansion/contraction -- e.g. changing the Space vs. Time Slope).

So Heat does not cause Space Expansion! The expansion of Space -- and Pranic -- Energy causes expansion of Space.

This also happens in Thermodynamics. When we burn something to create Thermal Energy, we are converting something from "denser" to "lighter" form, and this is going to cause the "expansion" of Space to conserve the Mass (and Energy).

So now you are convinced? If not, you are still a Materialist!! Ha! Ha!! Ha!!!

Now watch these videos:

Bio Telekineseis - Demonstrating Relativistic Effects and Space (Time) Modification by Energy/Mass

Still not convinced? As per Scientists, 74% is Dark Energy, 24% is Dark Matter and only 2% is Visible Matter. That emptiness of Space in the Universe carries the most of the Energy!!

Problem of Double Cover

2011-10-09T15:47:00.000-07:00

It shows up in Physics a few times: (1) g-factor =2 but being explained using SR as Thomas Precession but half of expalined by CP, (2) Deflection of near Star's light by Sun by factor of 2 explained by GR but half of what NG explained, and (3) Left Handed Parity of Beta Radiation.

In nature and in Universe, it can be seen that something of a Spinor or Complex Vector rotates twice faster than the particle. The equation of SHM in Geometric Algebra would confirm this aspect.

So what (3) shows that there is a speed of light or at the speed of Quantum Entanglement the observed Universe is "spinning" twice faster - or it is acting like a spin particle of 1, which means besides the Visible Universe accelerating it is also being pointed in one direction!

Is it not obvious when one thinks of the Visible Universe coming from Big Bang? This geometriy of Visible Universe is conical but our view of the universe is spherical.

Other way to think of, the angle of subtended at the center is twice of the angle subtended on the arc.

Predicting Neutrinos Are Majorana Particle

2011-10-09T13:30:00.000-07:00

In my analysis based on my works on Electrons and Positrons, Neutrinos are their own Anti-Neutrinos: they are their own Anti Particle, with spin of h/2.

This would be a 3rd test of my hypothesis. First two that have come true are: (1) Electron Spin is not a QM Spin and linked with Spin of Proton like in CP, and (2) Speed of surface of photon, weaving an electron or positron, would exceed the speed of light, as the space itself goes through the effect akin to LASER, but here the "amplification" is in the moving medium of Space and the speed of photon gets the boost.

I want to qualify this by what I mean. The "Etheral Space" or the Science "Dark Energy" field is pointing outward or inward in case of Neuotrino and its Anti Particle. For Electron, the "Electric" field was pointing outward and for the Positron, the "Electric" field was pointing inward but we were able to detect it. But in case of Neutrino, we are in the Space of many fields, including super imposed Etheral Space, to detect the Neutrinos and Antineutrinos seperately would be impossible - unless at high energy we have some good sensors. So we would always sense the "bubbling" Neutrino coming Space out, but never the "sinking" Anti Neutrino. In this sense we would conclude that Neutrino is their own Anti Particle.

More than Speed of Light Instances

2011-10-02T16:09:00.000-07:00

(1) Frame Dragging

(2) Electron Spin

(3) Super Luminal Features

Frame Dragging And Kerr Metric Points

Problem With Western Modern Science

Speed Of Light Broken

Frame Dragging and Kerr Metric Points to Ether

2011-10-02T11:12:00.001-07:00

The surrounding surface space around Black Hole called Erogsphere is dragged along with the velocity of light. Within this sphere the dragging is greater than the speed of light, and any observer/particle is forced to co-rotate.

The electron, positron and neutrino, are creations of photon trapped in Space and Time High Energy Perturbation and constrained. Electron and Positron are mirrors of each other and where Electrical Field dominates the Radial Fields Outward or Inward. The neutrino is manifested when the Space Field (Dark Energy, Ether, Prana, Chi) dominates and it has its own mirror. The third kind of perturbation is Magnetic Field Dominating inward and outward, but that is not to be seen on this side of Reality, and one day may be seen when those High Energy Colliders match the limits where one could momentarily cross to the "other side".

So the surface of an electron would be spinning faster than the speed of light, where the Spin Angular Momentum would be classically linked to the Spin Magnetic Moment. This argument was ruled out by Bohr but now we can see this is an acceptable statement. The rest of the explanations, on g=2, and alpha = 1/137.5, I have explained in the other postings.

Problem with the Western Modern Science

2011-09-30T19:17:00.001-07:00

http://the-magic-of-yoga.blogspot.com/2011/07/bio-telekineseis-demonstring.html

It is good for most of the practical gross matters and a fair science but not good as an Absolute Science. It forgets the limitations of the Body, Mind, Intellect (BMI) - and the Ego! It does not measure the "Measurer" or the Observer!

It is based on Numericism and sometimes Absolute Reality needs to be understood with Empiricism.

So it is very important that Physicists studying Nature or Reality become Spiritualists - and all good Physicists become that eventually, and there have been many incidences of them becoming even Vegetarians!

Why is it like that? Because they understood the laws of Actions and Reactions working at the subtlest levels of Reality and reaching till Soul Levels!!

So how does Yoga come in place here? Basically it is a self-practicing science which can only be experienced and not explained - and it helps a person transcend the BMI and Ego barrier and also physically experience the Science's so called Dark Energy - and Chinese Chi and the Indian Prana.

It is this force that has been missed by MM Experiement as Ether and one gets tuned to this Energy in the Yogic Path. The Truth Reveals itself when one Identifies Oneself With Truth!

I will show that how my experiment on the self shows a Space-Time modification of 1 c.m. is better than the previous experiments conducted to prove Einstein's General Relativity.

When Einstein proposed General Relativity, its first vindication came when it could account for the discrepancy in Perihelion Precession of the Planet Mercury, which was noted to be 38/3600 or 43/3600 degrees over 100 years! Imagine the accuracy of their tools 200 years back and the Ego principle of the Measurer asserting in this principle of Self Assertion!

The other test was the measurement of the deflection of a star's original position because of Sun's Gravitational Field. The theory predicts a deflection of 1·7" for a light ray grazing the sun’s disc. As is well known, this latter value for the deflection of light, rather than 0·87" or 3·4", was confirmed by the British eclipse expeditions of 1919 under circumstances which catapulted Einstein to world renown. Please note that this is when Light is travelling for Light Years in Astronomical Units!

Now we know Temperature can increase the size of the Mass, Liquid and Gas. We also know that Special Relativity says, as we approach the speed of light, the length would contract (and in one posting I would try to explain this in simple terms).

General Relativity says that Mass and Energy modifies Space-Time Fabric (but it is a misnomer for a Phase Diagram Relationship actually but cleverly used by Einstein to cover up Ethereal Space).

Here I show that through Yogic Powers, one can shift Pranic, Chi or Science's Dark Energy, and change the size of one's hand or leg by 1 c.m. in seconds - but no one is listening!!

It is this energy when understood, can explain all realities in togetherness with Electric and Magnetic Fields. I call it the Space-Field which gives rise to the notion of Space - and more accurately the first, second and third order derivatives - the Velocity, Acceleration and Jerks.

Speed of Light Broken

2011-09-22T23:26:00.000-07:00

BBC News:

Speed of Light Broken

My Postings:

Fine Structure Constant

Arithmentic Series in Quantum Mechanics

Proton Spin Connected with Electron Spin

They Will Never Find Zero Higgs Boson

I have known for 3 years that when in 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 Dimensional Gyroscope if some perturbation is applied, the correction happens like an instantenous Quantum Entanglement - which is not explained either by SR or GR - and taken as an accepted fact for QM and QF. This is faster than the speed of light!

In last 3 years, I have predicted a few things after dwelling in a book, which was written 3 years back, on the fact called Reality. Please see my other Science and Math Postings.

I basically predicted that the Electron and Positron are nothing but a photon caught up in High Energy Space-Time Disturbance and Constraint. And it explains Gyromagnetic Ratio g=2, Quantum Spin = h/2 but also shows that it is nothing but a double Magnetic Pole glued together with N-N or S-S points as an artifact, and even calculates the Fine Structure Constant α = 139.5. It also classically links the Spin of Electron with the Spin of Proton.

It does not violate any experiments except reinterpret the MM Experiment. I have explained the reason for this difference as I used well known 6 Physical Constants, which are still measured by us in a material world, and show it is same as Golden Ratio Angle of 137.5.

There is no violation of any SE, GKE, LE, WE, PE or any disagreement with SR, GR, QM or QF - and infact integrates them all well with CP. It also takes into account the Lie Alzebra, Grassman Alzebra, Quaternions, Geometric Alzebra, etc. and explains them without violating any known facts or experiments.

So one of the argument given against the spinning electron producing Angular Magnetic Moment was that it was greater than the speed of light for the size of the electron.

Well when photon travels over photon, wave over wave, for the constrained Space and Time, for the Energy Level that went into trapping photon in Space-Time to make an Electron or Positron, it would beat the speed of light! This has an equivalent in the GR Frame Dragging effect which is nothing but a camouflager around the Ether effect.

Under the Lense–Thirring or Frame Dragging effect, the Frame of Reference in which the clock ticks the fastest is one which is revolving around the object as viewed by a distant observer. This also means that light traveling in the direction of rotation of the object will move past the massive object faster than light moving against the rotation, as seen by a distant observer. It is now the best-known effect, partly thanks to the Gravity Probe B experiment. Qualitatively, frame-dragging can be viewed as the gravitational analog of electromagnetic induction.

Because they could not explain it using CP, they called it QM Spin! Dirac's Equation for the first time predicted this as well as Positron - and there is no conflict with his Equation but gives a very Geometric and Alzebric Visualization!

So what is the speed of light? Basically the Fabric of 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 Dimension, when is disturbed by some energy, the photon is ejected from nowhere - the Vacuum Empty Space - which is the Infinite Source of Energy.

The photon is that disturbance which would then travel in Space as a finger running the strings up and down, but the strings are 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 Dimensions. This is the purest observation and fastest observation a man could observe in Nature - and closest to the Ground Reality.

Now what are Neutrinos? Basically they are the "third" combination after Positron and Electron - where the Micro Gravity, or the Dark Energy, or the so called Elusive Ether which makes the photon move, gives rise to the notion of velocity and accelerations. This is explained in my book.

I also know that that photon is not massless. And I also know that photon does not keep travelling for ever - thought it travels for many Light Years beyond our imagination. And I also know photon does not travel straight as the density of the Ether or Space Fabric is disturbed by Masses, Energy and other perturbations.

So our whole view of the Universe, and the Big Bang is very limited. Big Bangs are many and what we see is the Matter which is Visible. The expanding Matter is the Universe which we see as Expanding and Accelerating. But we need to see beyond this which contains that Expanding Matter.

So what happened in CERN? Basically they approached the Energy Levels where Neutrinos, the three generations called Neutrino, Muon and Tau which are nothing but Resonance of the same energy function, got caught up in something like an event approaching QM Entanglement.

Think like a neutrino disappearing in the Space Fabric but instantenously arriving a few distance apart - and not travelling like Photon.

Why is it? It is because of Neutronis express more of the Space we see - because of Microgravity, Dark Energy or Ether. Only Space can beat the Space in simple terms! This is the Worm Hole Einstein talked about!!

Fine Strucure Constant is Golden Angle Ratio - And Connected With Famous Constants of Mathematics and Physics

2011-09-11T08:15:00.001-07:00

Background:
I have this known for 3 years and documented in my second book: (New) The Tao of Physics. Would like someone from Academia to give me a chance for PhD and also review this book. This was based on my quest for Truth.

Golden Angle:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_angle

Fibonacci_number:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

Fine Structure Constant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant.

From Wiki, it is interprated as:

(1) The square of the ratio of the elementary charge to the Planck charge

(2) The ratio of two energies: (i) the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons a distance of d apart, and (ii) the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ = 2πd (from a modern perspective, of angular wavelength r = d ; see Planck relation):

(3) The ratio of the velocity of the electron in the Bohr model of the atom to the speed of light. Hence the square of α is the ratio between the Hartree energy (27.2 eV = twice the Rydberg energy) and the electron rest mass (511 keV). The ratio of three characteristic lengths: the classical electron radius re, the Bohr radius a0 and the Compton wavelength of the electron.

(4) The ratio of three characteristic lengths: the classical electron radius re, the Bohr radius a0 and the Compton wavelength of the electron.

On Fibonicci Numbers:

On Golden Angle:

The FC calculated and observed is 137.035 and GA = 137.5, which is a theoretical number. I calculate this number close to 139.5. Why this discrepancy? Basically not all constants are precisely known from Absolute Zero and Rest point of view, and which do not have the bias of the material and relativistic observer that we are. And my number is based on a model which approximates as 1st order.

It does not violate all the interpretations of the FC Constant and shows a Geometric-Alzebra Relationships of all these constants. It does not violate any observations of Golden Ratio Angle and Fibonicci Numbers.

One is a Ratio and the other is an Angle. This is because sometimes Planc Constant is divided by 2Pi Radians to derive another Planck Bar Constant. And in making translations from MKS to CGS systems, 1/4Pi is also used.

In my book I have show how this famous constant of QM, calculated and confirmed in Experiments, and the famous constant known to the Ancients, and also found in the Nature through Fibonicci Numbers Series expressions in Sun-Flower, Phylotaxis, Spiral-Log movement of Waves, including Light, movement of matter in Galaxies, how the Eye sees Light in formation of Iris Patterns, and how an Fire-Fly Insect homes on its Target Flame, or a Bee Honey Comb Eyes sess.

I show how this constant is connected with following constants:

1. Speed of Light, c.
2. Planck Constant, h.
3. Electric Permittivity of Free Space, ε.
4. Magnetic Permeability of Free Space, µ.
5. Exponent Constant E = 2.71.
6. Pi = π.

Also, please see my previous posting on the gryomagnetic coupling g=2, Spin of h/2, and mention of Electron and Positron being nothing but a Photon spunning these particles, caught in Space and Time constraints of High Energy Perturbations. This does not violate any experiment in Physics - except for reinterpreting MM experiment.

The factor of 137 is basically a "Remainder Effect" which links these forces from a Photon Particle perspective.

This is also connected with how the Waves Propogate in Inversion of Mathematics of Addition/Subtraction and Multiplication/Division - and connected with Geometry of Alzebra.

And it agrees with Lapalace Equation, Poission Equation, Wave Equation, Schrondinger Equation, Dirac Equation and Klein-Gorden Equation.

Quantum Numbers and connection with Arithmetic Series in Nature

2011-09-03T09:56:00.000-07:00

Wanted to share something which I noticed during my quest for Truth. Some of it you already know but not sure how much deep you have gone on this. The formula for sum of first N Numbers is N (N+1) /2, and sum of first of N^2 numbers is N (N+1) (2N+1) / 6, and sum of first N ^3 is [ N (N+1) / 2]^2, which is basically squaring the Sum of First N Numbers. You all know this.

The Sum of First N Numbers can be thought as an Area of a Triangle dotted with a series of dots approximating the triangle, starting with N dots, N-1, and so on. Since we need to go 0 Dots to make a perfect Triangle, we get the factor of N+1 and factor of 1/2 from the area of Triangle - as it is half of Rectangle. This can also be thought as number of Neighbors one has among N Neighbors.

The second formula can be thought as Volume of a "Double" Pyramid extended by the above dotted triangle to give itself a symmeterical 3-D figure, givng 2N + 1 Layers of N-Dotted Triangles, where they vary from 0 to N. The height has to vary +N and -N on "each side" with 0 as common base, hence the term 2N+1. Now the term 1/3 comes from the Volume of Pyramid Formula.

The story does not stop here. The Quantum Numbers come from background of 3D Harmonics, which are nothing but similar to 1D Fourier Series, which says any wave can be carved out by ad mixing a series of Sin and Cos Waves of Harmonics, e.g., multiples of a common frequency 'f', with different proportions of Amplitude. 3D Harmonics is also similar, which says how to take a Sphere, and carve out different blocks of 3D, 2D and 1D patterns which would add up to sum a 3D Sphere! Think of stacking different layers of thin shells of layers to make an Sphere, e.g, like an Onion. Or take different slices of Oranges cut vertically or horizontally, and stacked up to make a Sphere. Or think of drawing different patterns of quadrants on the surface of the Sphere. Now make this into different combinations, and essentially this is the 3D Harmonic Series equivalent.

Now lets come to the Quantum Numbers. The first quantum number is "n", which show the shell number, and varies from 1 to N, giving (N) States. This can be thought as the layer or the story at which an electron resides or orbits. There was nothing magic about Quantum Jumps, as stated by Planck, as electrons are not dumb to not take a "lane approach to driving" vs driving at any analog levels, Hence they take quantum jumps, otherwise they would collide and interfere with each while "driving", and this also fits with the 3D-Harmonics. It is the radial 1D Expansion of enumeration of first N "points" in Space. Plus there is a deeper mystery on the nature of quantum of jumps which tied with the De Broglies hypothesis of the orbits being integral number of electron wave lenghts. But what is missed is that they are also tied with the wave lenght of the photon absorbed or emitted, yet, admitted in the Energy formula of E = hv. No one talks about the physical process explaning how the photon injection or emmision ties to Electron changing its orbit.

The second quantum number is "l", which varies from 0 to N, giving (N+1) States. This is the Angular Momentum Quantum number, which gives a "circular" sweep to the N points "radius" to make it a circle.

The third quantum number is 'm" and varies from -N to +N, giving (2N+1) States. This is the Magnetic Quantum Number, and it basically takes the mechanical motion of the electron in circular orbit to give a 3D Spherical effect to account for North and South Poles of Magnetic Moment which accounts for spinning - like the Earth's motion

And the fourth quantum number is the Spin 1/2, which is of a Quantum Mechnical nature and there is no classical explaination given. But actually, in my quest, I have found this to be a double covered Sphere which is spun by Photon, giving two N-S pole combinations, where the electron is N-N or S-S artifact of the weaving of the Electron by Photon. The Positron has the opposite artifact because of the same weaving of positron by photon - but in opposite manner.

What does the Sum of N^3 tell about the 4rth Quantum Number? Basically it is the square of the Sum of N, which is like a Cross Product of 2 Dimensions divided by 2 or the Area of a Triangle of sides with N and N+1 Dimensions (the second sweep is 1 unit more). It tells about a 4D effect, where the Cross Vector is either "Up" or "Down", and the 4D Reality is the product of the two Cross Products, e.g. Cross of Cross and like the Triple Product of 3D, which is Volume. This gels with the notion of +h/2 Up and h/2 Down Vector. So Planck Constant is a notion of "minimal" 1D or 2D (as for next dimension it is 1 unit more) unit of some "space".

This is also validated if one takes the Relativity explaination given by the QM for accounting the g=2 for gyromagnetic ratio coupling, but not linking it with the spin of 1/2. The gyromagentic ratio is basically the coupling between Angular Momentum and the Magnetic Moment, and experimentally they found it to be double than what was predicted by Classical Physics. They at one point explained this by Relativistic Effects and Chirality. But my explaination is very Geometrical, and is also blessed by Geometric Algebra, Clifford Algebra, Lie's Algebra, Grassman's Algebra, and SO(3) Symmetries.

Now if you see all these factors, explaination of 3D Harmonics, and the Formulas for Sum N, N^2 and N^3 numbers, you would see there is a lot of similarities and geometrical parallels.

So where is the factor of 1/3 and it is missing in QM? It's pointing to 3 times play of fields, in 3 x 3 x 3 Dimensions.

In another posting, I would explain how the Fine Structure Constant Factor of 1/137.5 is related to different Constants and some famous constants of Science, including Fibonicci Numbers and Golden Ratio.

Oh, yes it is connected with Gold Ratio Angle of 137.5!

2 Neat Equations

2011-03-27T19:44:00.000-07:00

(k+1) (k^4 -1) / (k-1) (k^4 +1) = 2

Know the solution to this in trial-and-error fashion.

This is a piece of a much larger puzzle, where I have been able to connect 9 famous physical constants using my physics (and leveraging what others have also discovered so far) and which also bridges QM, CP and GR - and does not break any experiment except reinterprets one experiment. But I am still trying to connect all the dots.

Only 1 person I know who may have understood the above and below equation but he is dead.

(k+1) (k^5 -1) / (k-1) (k^5 +1) = 3

Do not know the solution of this.

They will never find Zero Spin Higgs Boson or Zero Spin Gravitons

2011-02-05T03:41:00.001-08:00

Lets see how this goes.

First of all even today Physics does not understand the Duality of Electron and Photon, in terms of they being Particles or Waves!

It is for the same reason they may say they have found it in some very sophisticated multi-billion dollar experiment, but would have to coin a new term, like "new quantum", or "new general relativity" to nomenclature the duality of the interpretation.

In absolute sense, they would not find the zero spin Higgs Boson or Zero Spin Graviton. I am not saying they are not there, but just like Dinosars of the past, one can not find them, as one has to travel back to millions of years to find the Dinosars, and like that one has to traverse millions layers of reality to come across the Higgs Boson or Zero Sping Gravitons. They are an expression of the Reality at one level and most of the expressions fit transiently in High Accelerator Labs in time scales that are recorded as a "trace in flash" on some man made material referential frame. So they are capturing a "corner points" of the multi-dimensional Simplex Problem, so to speak.

This is resolved in my book written around 2008-2009, but thought over them in 2007 as a means of entertainment (which to some people the hermit-like behavior may look madness or antisocial behavior, or can even comprehend that people can entertain themselves like they do with other means and fell victim to a political savvy average technical manager who is going to become a good politician on polls and refused to give 1 month of PTO after 8 months of relentless work where only 2 hours of sleep were averaged - it is his Karmic journey as is mine to be become a Seeker of the Reality - and where many medical issues arose but he was blind to physical symptoms before him, including a HA).

Anyway, the Standard Model is just one abstraction layer of the Reality. It describes how the leptons, quarks, gauge bosons and the Higgs particle fit together.

I am trying to conclude my Volume 3 with some final conclusions. My Volume 2 is the most enriching experience for understanding today's Physics and reconciles General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics.

But the Time Dimension was the flipping dimension for me - sometimes I would use it as a scalar and sometime as a vector, and suffered from the Reference Frame of mine being biased towards "my view". But God does not see it that way, though one can still see it as a "projection" of the Reality. Example being, Fish Eye Lens phenomena, or Moeibus Transformation on Reimann Sphere.

So far I have not contradicted all known experiments but move towards the Mother of All Principles. Yes, I am leveraging a lot of research done by all great people in the field of Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry too.

Proton Spin Connected With Electron Spin - Quantum Entanglement - Written in Private Volume 2 Book

2011-01-22T13:54:00.000-08:00

----- Forwarded Message ----

Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 8:08:54 PM
Subject: I wrote this discovery in my book volume-2 3 years back..

Not trying to boast as I face my creator, the Mother of All Principles, which is also called by many names, including God, SuperSoul, Universal Mind, and so on.

This search has led me to most rocking experiences of my life medically..and if I share, you would not believe it. One day I will share..

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=solid-state-entanglement

Thanks to my school friends for all calling me Scientist which I always wondered and belittled..

It is on electronic record in public domain...

Now I am a humbled person shown humility in last 3 years..and in progression for whole life..and more so in last 15 years, last 20 years, last 23 years, and so on..

Again touching everyones feet and all of the people in world.

LOL and Regards,
A Wave In Universal Ocean of Infinite Waves

----- Forwarded Message ----

Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 11:49:02 PM
Subject: Please save this for Posteriority...it all belongs to you as you all have shaped me too over 5 years..and over 30 years..

Lets see how it goes..as I do not have energy make this a priority - as I often fall more sick pushing for this knowledge further..

Again touching your feets for showing any arrogance/ego/eccentricity/madness.

LOL
A Wave In Universal Ocean of Infinite Waves

----- Forwarded Message ----

Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 11:39:27 PM
Subject: Hello - Salutations For Your Achievement - I wrote this in a private book - volume 2 in 2007

Dear Stephenie,

The same picture is in my book. ;-)

First of all, it is a great piece of news for people seeking the Truth - I call it the Mother of All Principles, or the God Principle. Some people call it Boson Particle and some call it Unified Field Theory, or Theory of Everything. Please convey my regards and congratulations to the team members.

I am not a Phd in anything but an EE from Indian Institute of Technology, India with 22 Patents and 30 years in Computing/Networking/Hardware/IT industries. Have worked for many companies like Burroughs, Unisys, Convergent (Intel/PARC spin out), Pointcast (60% Internet Traffic in 1996-1997 as Architect and Top 3 site after NS/MS starting 1995), The term best describes me is Polymat - as I have learned.

My first vol 1 - covered understanding Gravity over 20 years as I was not convinced by GR Tensors/ST Fabric explanation. So I used first principles and related 'G' to 'EMF' equations. But for microscopic scales, I used additive mathematics, and for macroscopic I used multiplicate mathematics (it can be explained as first order approximation because of scales involved). But I was not happy about this leap of faith. This thinking I would do over sitting in tub and trying to sleep and wondering about these matters. Here I taught myself Tensors and Differential Geometry (after leaving IIT at Vector Calculus, Quantum Mechanics/Schroedinger Equation, though not understanding much but getting Ex Grade on borrowed notes of a Gold Medalist with an overnight studies of Finals of a course material of 6 months)

After many years of break, I had a medical crisis of my life. I had many passings as I was literally went through a meltdown of matter - or surviving a black hole journey. So to keep my mind off my problems, I would doc what I found and went back and validated most of the famous experiments in last 150 years to hold my theories. Here I also taught myself Group Theory, Atomic Particles, Exterior Alzebra, Spinors, Grasmman stuff, etc. Of course it was not like taking assignments but reading it and understanding it (like I did in my 11 Grade and IIT Entrance Examination by going over Solutions Books many times and not solving the problems - as I wanted to transform myself from an average approaching 40-55% Grade to 70-90% Grade with material for 3 years in 1 year Board Exam, and also prepare by myself for the (in)famous JEE Exam of India, where the level was tested at B.Sc 2 year level - after 11th Grade during those days with 5 year B.Tech course).

Surprisingly, I came to many conclusions, and 1 was what you found. And for me the Quantum Jump (and Spin +-1/2) and Dual Particle were no more a modern Physics puzzle - and I could reconcile GR with Quantum Mechanics. But this led from disagreeing the famous MM experiment done some 100 years back - because of geocentric, egocentric and matter centric view of the un evolved souls - and reinterpreting it. Basically the subtle cannot be measured by the gross device, e.g., you can not catch air by a fish net! There were many new understandings on speed of light as well, etc.

I had some struggle crossing 9 to 10 dimensions, and was not sure how to understand Time and sometimes I would reach 12 Dimensions. I ignored String-Theory, M-String Theory, and kind of intitutively predicted kind of Parallel Universes, around 2006/2007. But it is a subjective interpretation of the Scientists, and it included me. But in this attempt, I understood what GR was saying - but beyond most of the people in understanding it for a long period of the history.

Knowing this path of Knowledge is very testing and one can also die seeking the answers. And I was hospitalized in many hospitals over 3 years and had mult faculty failures, including a HA (over 3 days), and one unofficial one (5 months before).

Because of other experiences in life and nature of my soul in its reincarnation journey, I had mystical and struggling life, including a son loosing 40% Brain 15 years back. I proved many doctors wrong for the long term prognosis, including in India where the incident happened, and in the US California Stanford and many others. Some of the theories I used to recover him, where established by Harvard 6 months later, and some 10 years later by Princeton (the famous Random Generator Experiment, the 100 Monkey Theory, the Universal Mind, the Human Mind resonating at the same frequency as the Ionosphere, Women's Menses connected with the Orbit of the Moon, etc). There are many other such incidences and my children know this and seen it.

So to help my boy and my hurt soul, I went looking for Knowledge in West as well in the East, going back to the Ancient Indian texts. I taught myself Sanskrit and used it as a Therapeutic Tool to exercise my son's brain (for memory, logic, context switching, patternization, sequencing, etc.) I became a certified Yoga Teacher on an Indian's Swami's urging in one of my 2 months stays in an Ayurveda Hospital (the world's first medical encyclopedia was compiled 500 BC by Charak and Shusrita - please check Wikipedia please). I also read on Medical Sciences - as well as on Scriptures like Vedas, Gita, etc. Stanford Doctors would often think I am a doctor.

Using my knowledge in Vol 2, and understanding of SR/Unified Field, and knowledge/experience of Yoga, I could do a GR experiment on myself, and change length of my hands/feet size (and once height) by as much as 1 cm - and there was a second part of the experiment which became something like MM contradiction but I could explain it using GR and Heisenberg Principle). This has now been witnessed by a few of my IIT friends, two doctors, many social friends, familly friends and a school friend who is a doctor. In traditional sense it is called Telekinesis and Mind Over Body. Yogic and Chinese Traditions call it by different name. Video capture by frame by frame shows the growth! But Relativistic Measurements come into picture in my 2nd experiment.

Then waiting for 3 years to recover, take of my duties, I left this pursuit, to only get back to it, a month back, with finally understanding 10-12 dimensions and now it is matching all discoveries in Physics till now - but my personal experiences health wise are very delicate to say the least. But I fight with my will and Yoga to take care of my duties.

So sometime, I would document Vol 3 in my understanding. But all these books are electronically book marked and in private spaces on Internet. Then I did not have the energy to get into politics, fights, and this was for my satisfaction - as more practical things waited for me to take care of, like looking after my son and family with my broken body/brain/mind. I survive by doing intensive Yoga/Walking/Elleptic Machine Workouts/Meditations - and every day is a challenge and draw my energy from the Infinite.

Researching, I found that people like Grassman, Newton, Aristole, Pythogorus were all like me! But it is not my small "i" but the Super Soul "I" speaking - like many layers of onion. So I am also a Poet, Philospher, Historian, Blogger to Spread Peace (as we are one family based on History, Genetics, Linguistics, Spiritually, etc.). Where Science stops, Philosophy must start (why we do call it PhD!)?

I have spelled out everything so that you could one day help me improve on my knowledge with more rigorous mathematics and consensus. Yes I do use equations in Physics, from Maxwells to Differential Geometry and so on, and can explain effects like Searle Effects and Hutchinson's Effect, which I did in Vol 2.

This is not for me but for the humanity. If I have sounded egoist, please forgive me. I have been humbled and trained humility in many sufferings.

These are three links that you can use to check on me:

Also, this may interest you.
http://sanskrit-words.blogspot.com/2008/03/same-principle-i-used-to-help-my-son.html

Love and Regards,

A Wave In Universal Ocean of Infinite Waves

Pascal Combinations

2011-01-22T13:40:00.000-08:00

Sent: Fri, December 22, 2006 4:30:03 PM
Subject: RE: Request for guidence - discovery of some new sequence patterns and its application in combination theory

When I looked up at Wikepedia and Mathworld
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/),
I did not find any reference to the polygonal numbers when I discovered
this series around end of Nov but yesterday, I checked again with
Wikepedia and found reference to polygonal numbers.

But never-the-less, I have discovered these 2 formulas (but 1 can be
said to iterative result of well known formula but it gives us some new
understanding). Read the URL for complete process and interpretation
as I found out this.

Summary:

The Combination 2nCn can be also summarized as:

y = N x = N + 1 – y

= ∑ αN * ∑ x - Sum Series

y=0 x=1

αN is for N = 3 is 1, 1, 1, 1, which is 1C0, 2C0, 3C0 and 4C0

for N = 4, it is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 - Seq, which is 1C1, 2C1, 3C1, 4C1
and 5C1

for N = 5, it is 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21 - Sum of Seq, which is 2C2,
3C2, 4C2, 5C2, 6C2, 7C2

for N = 6, it is 1, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, 84 – Sum of Sum of Seq,
which is 3C3, 4C3, 5C3, 6C3, 7C3, 8C3, and 9C3.

Since we assume a single digit like 2 (for 2C1) to be one dimension
(since there are 1 and 1 combinations), and a series like 3 (1, 1, 1),
2 (1, 1), 1 (1) (for 4C2) to a 2-dimension series, for these cases, we
do not have the formula as it starts with 3 dimension plus.

The Combination 2nCn can be also summarized as:

y = N

= ∑ βN * (N+1 – y) C 1 - Combination Series

y=0

αN is for

for N = 3, it is 1, 2, 3, 4 - Seq, which is 1C1, 2C1, 3C1, 4C1

for N = 4, it is 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21 - Sum of Seq – 2C2, 3C2,
4C2, 5C2, 6C2,

for N = 5, it is 1, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, 84 – Sum of Sum of Seq
– 3C3, 4C3, 5C3, 6C3, 7C3, 8C3

for N = 6, it is 1, 5, 15, 35, 70, 126, 210 - Sum of Sum of Sum
of Seq – 4C4, 5C4, 6C4, 7C4, 8C4, 9C4, 10C4.

The above also satisfies nCr = n-1Cr-1 + n-1Cr, used recursively to
make all combinations of nC1 until r becomes 1 for all combinations.

For m+n Cn, it is in the paper.

Grassman

2009-08-10T11:52:00.000-07:00

Sounds like me? Actually a true seeker does not see differences in History, Philosophy, Science, Mathematics, Religion, Spiritualism, Philology, Etymology, Languages, etc. as the seeker will look into anything that enlightens one further in the path of the quest.

Newton was also a Historian, and a member of the Knights Templar and the Masons. The father of modern Philosophy was also a Physician, Mathematician, Scientist, etc., like other Greek philosophers and thinkers.

N-Dimensional Equation of The Reality

2009-04-23T15:04:00.001-07:00

N Dimensional Divine Expression N Dimensional Divine Expression sunilsrivastava1

Publish at Scribd or explore others: love success

As predicted - Black hole confirmed in Milky Way

2008-12-10T12:43:00.000-08:00

BACKGROUND POSTINGS

Giant Humans From The Past

Posted on 09/28/2008

From the Posting:

c. Less Gravity - further away from Sun or Milk Way's Black Hole.

White Hole - Did I say them in 1998/99 - you decide

It was also hypothised and made official by Blandford, R. D. in Aug 98 and published in Aug 99. Around '98 Aug I had also started talking to some of my Cisco colleagues over lunches over the year '98, but do not recall the months, but for sure by Aug' 98, as I was thinking of the subject since I was watching PBS Nova shows from early '90s.

UFO Anti Gravity Technology

From thje Posting :

Gravity is not the cause of Space-Time Curvature Bending! This is the fallacy of the modern Physicists! I am underwriting a paper (where I have also mentioned the fact that the center of the Milky Way and Galaxies have a Black Hole) but never getting to it.

Parallel Universes

Science of PraaNayama

From the Posting:

- Modern Science is still playing catch up and just watch the videos on the "Chis". Places like MIT have only recently found the "magic of surprises" associated with this phenomenon. Just the think what a Vortex river can do to a swimmer and what Tornado Vortex does!

- Only now the modern science is catching up. Beautiful things happen in Vortex point of Singularity - Big Bang, Black Hole, Super Conductivity, Embryo Formation, and so on. There are two coils to show the Downward Spiral Vortex ( broad to smaller spirals, from top to down) and the Upwards Spiral Vortex, (from big to small spiral from bottom to top). They symbolize the Positive and Negative Energy Fields, Heat and Cold, Male and Female Energies, or Prana and Apna.

Black hole confirmed in Milky Way

Page last updated at 20:45 GMT, Tuesday, 9 December 2008

By Pallab Ghosh
Science correspondent, BBC News

The Milky Way was tracked from an observatory in Chile

There is a giant black hole at the centre of our galaxy, a study has confirmed.

German astronomers tracked the movement of 28 stars circling the centre of the Milky Way, using two telescopes in Chile.

The black hole is four million times more massive than our Sun, according to the paper in The Astrophysical Journal.

Black holes are objects whose gravity is so great that nothing - including light - can escape them.

According to Dr Robert Massey, of the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS), the results suggest that galaxies form around giant black holes in the way that a pearl forms around grit.

'The black pearl'

Dr Massey said: "Although we think of black holes as somehow threatening, in the sense that if you get too close to one you are in trouble, they may have had a role in helping galaxies to form - not just our own, but all galaxies.

The most spectacular aspect of our 16-year study, is that it has delivered what is now considered to be the best empirical evidence that super-massive black holes do exist

Professor Reinhard Genzel
Head of the research team

"They had a role in bringing matter together and if you had a high enough density of matter then you have the conditions in which stars could form.

"Thus the first generation of stars and galaxies could have come into existence".

The researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany said the black hole was 27,000 light years, or 158 thousand, million, million miles from the Earth.

"Undoubtedly the most spectacular aspect of our 16-year study, is that it has delivered what is now considered to be the best empirical evidence that super-massive black holes do really exist," said Professor Reinhard Genzel, head of the research team.

"The stellar orbits in the galactic centre show that the central mass concentration of four million solar masses must be a black hole, beyond any reasonable doubt."

Observations were made using the 3.5m New Technology Telescope and the 8.2m Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile. Both are operated by the European Southern Observatory (Eso).

Free Energy John Hutchison

2008-09-04T18:45:00.000-07:00

Conventional Science and Mathematics is at loss in explaining these observed effects:

The Hawking Paradox

2008-08-01T00:20:00.000-07:00

Did Newton Lie ?

2008-02-27T22:28:00.000-08:00

I was hoping to keep this Blog on 'Math And Science Tit Bits' a bit private as it started with a place holder for something I had worked on while solving a problem for my daughter, who was going to some special math challenge classes.

In the process I learnt something and found some interesting series and patterns. Then I went to Wikipedia and Mathworld and could not find anything like what I found. Then over the weeks, after repeated searches, I started finding something overlapping. But still there were many novelties in the findings and besides letting the experts know, and not being challenged, I have quietly dropped the subject. And I may be just completely wrong 100% but it does not matter and what matters more is that one is learning.

For me it is a waste of time to defend all this, as I have many better things to do - like learning more and reading more as I feel that I do not know anything and the Human Knowledge is just a small tip of the proverbial iceberg of the Universe Knowledge World. So please excuse the quality of earlier postings.

Then it also became a place holder on something about Space which I had said back in 1998 but was "shut up" by an expert and later found that now-a-days this has become a hot topic. So I thought I would keep this as a note to myself without much ado. I am still learning on this topic and feel that I know nothing - but have been thinking of General and Special Relativity for past 10 years and writing to give my twist on understanding of General Relativity. But this is going on in background and not sure of the outcome. This is just for me to understand the subject and also write in simple terms but at the same time try to push the understanding further - at least mine. I feel that Einstein's Space-Time Warping is a very mathematical like and a model-like explanation on Gravity.

Without much further ado, in process of trying to introduce the Blog, as well as defend its poor quality postings as private place holder, here I go.

In past I have said the same thing about Newton knowing more than he acknowledged and on Indian Mathematics. See my article on the Newton Stone. So you know Newton was a very influential person and a member of the Knight Templers as well as the Freemasons - both hot topics in Hollywood movies for past few years. And he is buried in West minister Abbey.

Also I have sent emails to friends and colleagues on the Indian Contribution on Math. This news only confirms what I have found. Please see Indian Mathematics: Redressing the balance and Indian Mathematics.

News Release from University of Manchester (http://www.physorg.com/news106238636.html)

Scholars in India discovered one of the founding principles of modern mathematics hundreds of years before Newton1

A little known school of scholars in southwest India discovered one of the founding principles of modern mathematics hundreds of years before Newton – according to new research.

Dr George Gheverghese Joseph from The University of Manchester says the ‘Kerala School’ identified the ‘infinite series ’- one of the basic components of calculus - in about 1350.

The discovery is currently - and wrongly - attributed in books to Sir Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibnitz at the end of the seventeenth centuries.

The team from the Universities of Manchester and Exeter reveal the Kerala School also discovered what amounted to the Pi series and used it to calculate Pi correct to 9, 10 and later 17 decimal places.

And there is strong circumstantial evidence that the Indians passed on their discoveries to mathematically knowledgeable Jesuit missionaries who visited India during the fifteenth century.

That knowledge, they argue, may have eventually been passed on to Newton himself.

Dr Joseph made the revelations while trawling through obscure Indian papers for a yet to be published third edition of his best selling book ‘The Crest of the Peacock: the Non-European Roots of Mathematics’ by Princeton University Press.

He said: “The beginnings of modern maths is usually seen as a European achievement but the discoveries in medieval India between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries have been ignored or forgotten.

“The brilliance of Newton’s work at the end of the seventeenth century stands undiminished – especially when it came to the algorithms of calculus.

“But other names from the Kerala School, notably Madhava and Nilakantha, should stand shoulder to shoulder with him as they discovered the other great component of calculus- infinite series.

“There were many reasons why the contribution of the Kerala school has not been acknowledged - a prime reason is neglect of scientific ideas emanating from the Non-European world - a legacy of European colonialism and beyond.

“But there is also little knowledge of the medieval form of the local language of Kerala, Malayalam, in which some of most seminal texts, such as the Yuktibhasa, from much of the documentation of this remarkable mathematics is written.

He added: “For some unfathomable reasons, the standard of evidence required to claim transmission of knowledge from East to West is greater than the standard of evidence required to knowledge from West to East.

“Certainly it’s hard to imagine that the West would abandon a 500-year-old tradition of importing knowledge and books from India and the Islamic world.

“But we’ve found evidence which goes far beyond that: for example, there was plenty of opportunity to collect the information as European Jesuits were present in the area at that time.

“They were learned with a strong background in maths and were well versed in the local languages.

“And there was strong motivation: Pope Gregory XIII set up a committee to look into modernising the Julian calendar.

“On the committee was the German Jesuit astronomer/mathematician Clavius who repeatedly requested information on how people constructed calendars in other parts of the world. The Kerala School was undoubtedly a leading light in this area.

“Similarly there was a rising need for better navigational methods including keeping accurate time on voyages of exploration and large prizes were offered to mathematicians who specialised in astronomy.

“Again, there were many such requests for information across the world from leading Jesuit researchers in Europe. Kerala mathematicians were hugely skilled in this area.”

White Hole - Did I say them in 1998/99 - you decide

2008-02-02T00:04:00.000-08:00

It is a very amusing and satisfying story for me. In 1998-1999 I was amusing myself with all the NOVA shows on Space , Special Relativity, General Relativity, Gravity, Black Hole, Big Bang Theory and so on.

What was left unexplained to me in IIT, where I believe we only learnt to cram things without getting many fundamental concepts cleared, it was for me a time to do the catch up, specially after being away from school and books since 1982.

I was using my own musings, and like a " little rat" trying to follow the foot-steps of "giant mountain figure" called Einstein, doing my own mind experiments. I know to bring his name and the comparing my "mind experiments" to his, is tantamounting to me conducting blesphemy but I was trying sincerely to understand his stuff which went over my brain in the college days.

So I came up with this conclusion that the end of "black" hole was the beginning of a "big bang" or what is now called a "white hole".

Then in 2002 I heard that some NASA scientist came up with the same theory and for last 2 months, I have seen TV Shows talking about Parallel Universes, Time Travel, and White Hole with what I have had concluded in 1997/1998.

Here is the URL
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_thread/thread/153d3dc9f209647d/551eaa4623f4f4f5?lnk=st&q=sunils+blackhole#551eaa4623f4f4f5

As obvious, I was shut up by some expert.

Now watch or rather hear these videos.

Parallel Universes

2007-09-29T22:31:00.000-07:00

I was watching a science show today, called "Parallel Universe" and it talked about 11-Dimensional Universe Reality but before somwhere in BBC site, I had read about a lady scientist proposing 16 dimensions to the Universe which explains why Gravity is a weak force.

Think this URL covers it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/parallelunitrans.shtml

The interesting thing about this show was that they talked about the quest for Singular Theory and why the current laws of Physics breakdown at the point of a singularity called the Big Bang Space-Time Event.

In order to solve this issue, 3 Physicts on their way to a musical show on one fine evening, while taking a break away from the conference which they were attending, started talking about this singularity business and how to explain it.

Suddenly they came up with the theory that the parallel universes of N-dimensions come to collide with each other.